@inproceedings{ubo_mods_00191230, author = {Ma, Yuan and Kleemann, Timm and Ziegler, Jürgen}, editor = {}, title = {Psychological User Characteristics and Meta-Intents in a Conversational Product Advisor}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 9th Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems}, series = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings}, year = {2022}, publisher = {}, address = {}, volume = {3222}, pages = {18–32}, keywords = {conversational UI design, interactive behavior analysis, decision making, influence of psychological factors on interaction}, abstract = {We present a study investigating psychological characteristics of users of a GUI-style conversational recommender system in a real-world application case. We collected data of 496 customers of an online shop using a conversational product advisor (CPA), using questionnaire responses concerning decision- making style and a set of meta-intents, a concept we propose to represent high-level user preferences related to the decision process in a CPA. We also analyzed anonymized data on users’ interactions in the CPA. Concerning general decision-making style, we could identify two clusters of users who differ in their scores on scales measuring rational and intuitive decision-making. We found evidence that rationality and intuitiveness scores are differently correlated with the proposed meta-intents such as efficiency orientation, interest in detail, and openness for guidance. Relations with interaction data could be observed between rationality/intuitiveness scores and overall time spent in the CPA. Trying to classify users’ decision style from their interactions, however did not yield positive results. Despite the limitation that only a single CPA was studied in a single domain, our results provide evidence that the proposed meta-intents are linked to the general decision-making style of a user and can thus be instrumental in translating general decision-making factors into more concrete design guidance for CPA and their potential personalization.}, issn = {1613-0073}, url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3222/paper2.pdf}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{ubo_mods_00167689, author = {Kleemann, Timm and Wagner, Magdalena and Loepp, Benedikt and Ziegler, Jürgen}, title = {Modeling User Interaction at the Convergence of Filtering Mechanisms, Recommender Algorithms and Advisory Components}, booktitle = {Mensch Und Computer 2021 – Tagungsband}, year = {2021}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, pages = {531–543}, keywords = {Human factors; User experience; User modeling; Search interfaces; Recommender systems}, isbn = {978-1-4503-8645-6}, doi = {10.1145/3473856}, url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3473856.3473859?cid=87958660357}, language = {en}, abstract = {A variety of methods is used nowadays to reduce the complexity of product search on e-commerce platforms, allowing users, for example, to specify exactly the features a product should have, but also, just to follow the recommendations automatically generated by the system. While such decision aids are popular with system providers, research to date has mostly focused on individual methods rather than their combination. To close this gap, we propose to support users in choosing the right method for the current situation. As a first step, we report in this paper a user study with a fictitious online shop in which users were able to flexibly use filter mechanisms, rely on recommendations, or follow the guidance of a dialog-based product advisor. We show that from the analysis of the interaction behavior, a model can be derived that allows predicting which of these decision aids is most useful depending on the user’s situation, and how this is affected by demographics and personality.} } @inproceedings{ubo_mods_00148660, author = {Donkers, Tim and Kleemann, Timm and Ziegler, Jürgen}, editor = {Paternò, Fabio and Oliver, Nuria}, title = {Explaining Recommendations by Means of Aspect-Based Transparent Memories}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces}, year = {2020}, publisher = {The Association for Computing Machinery}, address = {New York, NY}, pages = {166–176}, isbn = {978-1-4503-7118-6}, doi = {10.1145/3377325.3377520}, url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3377325.3377520}, abstract = {Recommender Systems have seen substantial progress in terms of algorithmic sophistication recently. Yet, the systems mostly act as black boxes and are limited in their capacity to explain why an item is recommended. In many cases recommendations methods are employed in scenarios where users not only rate items, but also convey their opinion on various relevant aspects, for instance by the means of textual reviews. Such user-generated content can serve as a useful source for deriving explanatory information to increase system intelligibility and, thereby, the user’s understanding. We propose a recommendation and explanation method that exploits the comprehensiveness of textual data to make the underlying criteria and mechanisms that lead to a recommendation more transparent. Concretely, the method incorporates neural memories that store aspect-related opinions extracted from raw review data. We apply attention mechanisms to transparently write and read information from memory slots. Besides customary offline experiments, we conducted an extensive user study. The results indicate that our approach achieves a higher overall quality of explanations compared to a state-of-the-art baseline. Utilizing Structural Equation Modeling, we additionally reveal three linked key factors that constitute explanation quality: Content adequacy, presentation adequacy, and linguistic adequacy.} } @inproceedings{ubo_mods_00142455, author = {Loepp, Benedikt and Donkers, Tim and Kleemann, Timm and Ziegler, Jürgen}, title = {Impact of Consuming Suggested Items on the Assessment of Recommendations in User Studies on Recommender Systems}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’19)}, year = {2019}, publisher = {IJCAI Organization}, pages = {6201–6205}, keywords = {Recommender Systems}, doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2019/863}, url = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/863}, abstract = {User studies are increasingly considered important in research on recommender systems. Although participants typically cannot consume any of the recommended items, they are often asked to assess the quality of recommendations and of other aspects related to user experience by means of questionnaires. Not being able to listen to recommended songs or to watch suggested movies, might however limit the validity of the obtained results. Consequently, we have investigated the effect of consuming suggested items. In two user studies conducted in different domains, we showed that consumption may lead to differences in the assessment of recommendations and in questionnaire answers. Apparently, adequately measuring user experience is in some cases not possible without allowing users to consume items. On the other hand, participants sometimes seem to approximate the actual value of recommendations reasonably well depending on domain and provided information.} } @inproceedings{ubo_mods_00116566, author = {Loepp, Benedikt and Donkers, Tim and Kleemann, Timm and Ziegler, Jürgen}, title = {Impact of Item Consumption on Assessment of Recommendations in User Studies}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’18)}, year = {2018}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, pages = {49–53}, keywords = {User Studies}, isbn = {978-1-4503-5901-6}, doi = {10.1145/3240323.3240375}, url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3240323.3240375?cid=87958660357}, abstract = {In user studies of recommender systems, participants typically cannot consume the recommended items. Still, they are asked to assess recommendation quality and other aspects related to user experience by means of questionnaires. Without having listened to recommended songs or watched suggested movies, however, this might be an error-prone task, possibly limiting validity of results obtained in these studies. In this paper, we investigate the effect of actually consuming the recommended items. We present two user studies conducted in different domains showing that in some cases, differences in the assessment of recommendations and in questionnaire results occur. Apparently, it is not always possible to adequately measure user experience without allowing users to consume items. On the other hand, depending on domain and provided information, participants sometimes seem to approximate the actual value of recommendations reasonably well.} }